> > On Jun 20, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Jaime Metcher wrote: > > Re returning arrays of objects from the DAO - I like everything > > about this > > EXCEPT the fact that it's not going to work. > > That's what the Iterating Business Object pattern is for. It gives you > the benefits of consistent encapsulation of getter, setter and other > such logic without the performance costs of instantiating an array of > objects. >
Peter, Yep, all power to the IBO - I thought you'd be along to recommend it :) and I wholeheartedly concur. It's not an array, though. If you *really* want array semantics, you need to worry about performance. Otherwise go with a query or a query-backed wrapper like an IBO. Jaime --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
