Every direction I seem to go in my OO training, many suggest frameworks as resolutions to my problems or ways to make it easier for me to develop. What is some of the cost to these frameworks as far as performance? Alot of developers seem to use "caching" as a resolution to the performance costs, but isn't this just a band-aid to the real problem? Alot of people run their apps on VPS's and shared hosting so throwing more RAM & CPU at it can't be done easily, and you can only upgrade so far before the cost of upgrading outweighs trimming some fat out of the code.
I read about people refactoring systems into OO Design from procedural and seeing a big performance hit. Sure it was easy and fast with MVC/ ORM/IC, but at what cost? Do alot of developers use a mix of frameworks depending on the application need? A data reporting system would benefit from MVC, but due to its simplicity would ORM be overkill or is the overhead minimal making it worth while? Jon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
