On Wednesday 28 Jan 2009, Henry wrote:
> - Do you generate setters & getters for each property, or use
> onMissingMethod()?

For each. I use a CFE snippit so it's easy enough.

> - Do you think a complex bean with lots of properties will be more
> efficient with onMissingMethod() or with good old getters & setters
> for each property?

I would expect get/set to be more performant, but not that you'd notice.

> - Are methods generally in bean, or in Service layer (singleton) for
> better performance?

Controllers are normal a singleton service, yup.

> - Does the bean always stay in a valid state with restrictive setters?
> or do the setters and init() take in any type?

This looks like two questions.
Yes, after setFoo() returns, the object is still in a valid state. That's what 
encapsulation is for :-)
The setFoo() is normally typed via cfarugment, yes, because CFCDoc needs that.

> - Does the bean have validate() function?  Does it return an array of
> struct of {type, message}? or are you using any validation framework?

Ours don't, because the beans are normally fairly dumb VOs.

> - Does it always have some other standard methods?  Or does it extends
> some abstract/base bean?

See above.

> - Do you set default values for properties? if so, outside or inside
> init()?  maybe make use of cfproperty default field?

Outside any method, in fact. This is what the CF wizards in Eclipse do.

> - Does it lazy-load?  If so, how do you implement that?

Our Controllers call Reactor, which usually doesn't.

-- 
Tom Chiverton

****************************************************

This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.

Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and 
Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at 
Halliwells LLP, 3 Hardman Square, Spinningfields, Manchester, M3 3EB.  A list 
of members is available for inspection at the registered office together with a 
list of those non members who are referred to as partners.  We use the word 
“partner” to refer to a member of the LLP, or an employee or consultant with 
equivalent standing and qualifications. Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation 
Authority.

CONFIDENTIALITY

This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be 
confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the addressee you must not 
read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform 
any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or 
contents.  If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify 
Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 2500.

For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CFCDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to