Yes, I'm positive. Having the functions compiled to Java at compile time will ALWAYS be faster than dynamically evaluating the function at runtime. Though the fact that it's slower isn't the main reason I prefer real getter and setter functions and I doubt the difference is very large unless the oMM is performing a great deal of processing or metadata parsing.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Henry <[email protected]> wrote: > > Are you guys certain that oMM will be always less efficient? Didn't > creation (and attaching) methods into an object is also expensive in > CF8? Since beans needed to be created all the time, maybe the cost of > creation of methods will offset the slightly inefficient oMM? I guess > performance should not, in theory, affect how we construct our code, > but at some point it does. > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
