Yes, as long as you don't go too far and end up where the last thread left off, with an object that is packed with delegating methods.
There's actually nothing wrong with cyclical references. I wouldn't want them all over my code, but in some cases they are necessary. On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Henry <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Brain. So essentially you're saying, C can have a reference to > A directly, even though C also has B that has A? > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
