There's one thing I don't quite understand.. How come [obj...@name].getfieldvalue() is considered bad (because it is not a behaviour of Object), but getting the value by using a singleton (i.e. [obj...@name]service.getfieldvalue([obj...@name]id) ) is usually considered ok and preferred?
Aren't they essentially, the same thing? and I believe some argues that Singleton is even worse? Regards, Henry Ho On Feb 21, 6:25 pm, Sean Corfield <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Henry Ho <[email protected]> wrote: > > Would making the bookmarkManager singleton be.. very weird? > > Bear in mind the actual data belongs to the *user* not the bookmark > manager therefore bookmark manager has no state of its own. > > bookmarkManager.add(title,link); > bookmarkManager.sort(); > > Internally, if would use the OperatingSystem singleton to obtain the > user preferences store and interact with that for each operation. > > Make sense? > -- > Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN > An Architect's View --http://corfield.org/ > > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." > -- Margaret Atwood --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
