Thanks for the feedback, I was curious to see if there was a
general consensus.

I'm pretty sure that you don't need to prefix calls the implied getters and
setters in CF9 with this. You did in the CF9 beta, but I think they changed
that for the final release. I'll check that and report back when I get the
chance!

I used to always have getters and setters, as it feels like better
encapsulation, however my classes ended up having a bunch of "dumb" get/set
methods so accessing the private instance variables scope directly seems
like the pragmatic way to go. I did consider using onMissingMethod, but that
adds overhead and you do have to prefix with this.

- John

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CFCDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en.

Reply via email to