================
@@ -45,6 +45,25 @@ enum class InfoType {
IT_typedef
};
+enum class CommentKind {
+ CK_FullComment,
+ CK_ParagraphComment,
+ CK_TextComment,
+ CK_InlineCommandComment,
+ CK_HTMLStartTagComment,
+ CK_HTMLEndTagComment,
+ CK_BlockCommandComment,
+ CK_ParamCommandComment,
+ CK_TParamCommandComment,
+ CK_VerbatimBlockComment,
+ CK_VerbatimBlockLineComment,
+ CK_VerbatimLineComment,
+ CK_Unknown
+};
----------------
ilovepi wrote:
Should we just use the CommentKind from the clang AST? I haven't looked but I
would also suppose that those have parsers already to go to/from the enum. It
isn't a huge deal, but if we don't need to maintain that code ourselves .... it
could be a good option. That said, I don't think we tablegen things w/ `enum
class` so it may not be that great in the end. Anyway worth considering. I'm OK
either way if there's a decent reason.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142273
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
