================
@@ -974,7 +974,7 @@ class Foo final {})cpp";
HI.Name = "abc";
HI.Kind = index::SymbolKind::Variable;
HI.NamespaceScope = "";
- HI.Definition = "int abc = <recovery - expr>()";
----------------
kadircet wrote:
despite typoexprs fragile and complicated nature, i think they were providing
most of their value by preserving more nodes in the AST, that can later on be
used by source tools (especially for more error correction :)).
I don't think we need `TypoExpr`s for most of this, if possible, preserving
these `TypoExpr` nodes through `RecoveryExpr`s would actually help a lot with
preserving current behavior of tools but also shape of the AST for any other
application.
I wouldn't block on this though, and wouldn't be surprised if this isn't
trivial, we don't seem to be preserving typoexprs as recovery-exprs most of the
time and I am not sure why.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143423
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
