================
@@ -103,11 +103,11 @@
TargetCodeGenInfo::getDependentLibraryOption(llvm::StringRef Lib,
Opt += Lib;
}
-unsigned TargetCodeGenInfo::getOpenCLKernelCallingConv() const {
- // OpenCL kernels are called via an explicit runtime API with arguments
- // set with clSetKernelArg(), not as normal sub-functions.
+unsigned TargetCodeGenInfo::getDeviceKernelCallingConv() const {
+ // Device kernels are called via an explicit runtime API with arguments,
+ // such as set with clSetKernelArg() for OpenCL, not as normal sub-functions.
// Return SPIR_KERNEL by default as the kernel calling convention to
----------------
bader wrote:
I think, technically, there is a functional change to the logic of lowering
`CC_DeviceKernel`.
Before the patch:
```c++
if (CGM.getLangOpts().OpenCL)
return CGM.getTargetCodeGenInfo().getOpenCLKernelCallingConv();
if (CGM.getTriple().isSPIROrSPIRV())
return llvm::CallingConv::SPIR_KERNEL;
if (CGM.getTriple().isAMDGPU())
return llvm::CallingConv::AMDGPU_KERNEL;
if (CGM.getTriple().isNVPTX())
return llvm::CallingConv::PTX_Kernel;
llvm_unreachable("Unknown kernel calling convention");
```
after the patch (pseudo-code):
```c++
if (CGM.getTriple().isSPIR()) // do we override
`getDeviceKernelCallingConv` for SPIR-V target or use the default?
return llvm::CallingConv::SPIR_KERNEL;
if (CGM.getTriple().isAMDGPU())
return llvm::CallingConv::AMDGPU_KERNEL;
if (CGM.getTriple().isNVPTX())
return llvm::CallingConv::PTX_Kernel;
// by default, return SPIR_KERNEL
return llvm::CallingConv::SPIR_KERNEL;
```
But anyway, the new logic seems "okay" to me. We can be stricter to
`getDeviceKernelCallingConv` users and put something like
`llvm_unreachable("Unknown kernel calling convention");` in the base class
definition, but your version looks okay to me too.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144728
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
