================
@@ -20629,6 +20629,9 @@ Sema::ConditionResult Sema::ActOnCondition(Scope *S,
SourceLocation Loc,
case ConditionKind::ConstexprIf:
Cond = CheckBooleanCondition(Loc, SubExpr, true);
+ assert(isa<FullExpr>(Cond.get()) &&
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
`Cond` could still be invalid here, right? so `.get` would be ill-formed?
Should we be doing some sort of `if (Cond.isUsable())` or something?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146890
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
