================
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ namespace const_modify {
namespace null {
constexpr int test(int *p) {
- return *p = 123; // expected-note {{assignment to dereferenced null
pointer}}
+ return *p = 123; // expected-note {{read of dereferenced null pointer}}
----------------
AaronBallman wrote:
Is there a reason we can't say `assignment to` like we did before? I think
that's more clear than `access to`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143667
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
