================
@@ -7941,6 +7942,32 @@ static bool handleFunctionTypeAttr(TypeProcessingState
&state, ParsedAttr &attr,
return true;
}
+ if (attr.getKind() == ParsedAttr::AT_CFISalt) {
+ if (attr.getNumArgs() == 0)
----------------
bwendling wrote:
> Perhaps? Alternatively, should this be an `assert(attr.getNumArgs() == 1)` ?
I don't want to do that in Sema. The check will go away in a non-Assert-Release
build. And the compiler shouldn't ICE just because someone accidentally added
an extra argument.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141846
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
