================
@@ -4404,14 +4404,19 @@ CompareImplicitConversionSequences(Sema &S,
SourceLocation Loc,
Result = CompareStandardConversionSequences(S, Loc,
ICS1.Standard, ICS2.Standard);
else if (ICS1.isUserDefined()) {
+ auto ConvFunc1 = ICS1.UserDefined.ConversionFunction;
----------------
Sirraide wrote:
> The LLVM Coding Standards argue for `auto` in "other places where the type is
> already obvious from the context." I thought that's the case here...
That mostly applies to cases where the type is already explicitly mentioned in
the initialiser, usually because it’s some sort of `cast<>`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/154158
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
