hahnjo wrote: > > Invested some time today and I think the fix is #154158. It works for the > > reproducer posted in [#133057 > > (comment)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133057#issuecomment-2886816972), > > @ilya-biryukov or @emaxx-google if you have some time, would it be > > possible to test the two PRs together in your infrastructure? > > Unfortunately after repeating the testing on the google monorepo with these > two changes cherry-picked, there's a lot of errors observed. Minimizing > examples would take a few days, but to name some error messages: > > * `'std::tuple<std::string_view>::operator=' from module '...' is not > present in definition of 'std::tuple<std::string_view>' provided earlier` > > * `'std::pair<std::string, std::string>::operator=' from module '...' is > not present in definition of 'std::pair<std::string, std::string>' provided > earlier`
Hm, and that's after or instead of the previous problems. Ie did https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/154158 fix a problem and we get past that point, now seeing "later" issues? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133057 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
