flowerhack wrote:

Implementing this as a separate check rather than attacking it to 
`performance-for-range-copy` sounds fine to me.

I'll go ahead and close this PR out.  I've created an issue at 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/155922 where I offer more 
evidence/rationale for why this can be counted as a bugprone pattern.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/155731
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to