llvmbot wrote:

<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis

Author: Aiden Grossman (boomanaiden154)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

After the landing of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169320, the 
clang CFG analyses are able to do slightly more analysis around destructors. 
This results in thread safety also seeing slightly more destructors. This 
exposed a bug in ThreadSafety, where we would call getDestructorDecl, which can 
return nullptr for base class destructors, but not do a null pointer check, 
resulting in a segmentation fault.

This patch fixes the issue by adding a null pointer check and adds a regression 
test so this gets caught before downstream integration testing in the future.

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169593.diff


2 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafety.cpp (+1-1) 
- (added) clang/test/SemaCXX/no-warn-thread-safety-analysis.cpp (+12) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafety.cpp 
b/clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafety.cpp
index 77750cf89d7a7..a25bd6007d5ed 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafety.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafety.cpp
@@ -2820,7 +2820,7 @@ void 
ThreadSafetyAnalyzer::runAnalysis(AnalysisDeclContext &AC) {
         case CFGElement::AutomaticObjectDtor: {
           CFGAutomaticObjDtor AD = BI.castAs<CFGAutomaticObjDtor>();
           const auto *DD = AD.getDestructorDecl(AC.getASTContext());
-          if (!DD->hasAttrs())
+          if (!DD || !DD->hasAttrs())
             break;
 
           LocksetBuilder.handleCall(
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/no-warn-thread-safety-analysis.cpp 
b/clang/test/SemaCXX/no-warn-thread-safety-analysis.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..5b1964301fce7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/no-warn-thread-safety-analysis.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 -Wthread-safety 
-Wthread-safety-pointer -Wthread-safety-beta -Wno-thread-safety-negative 
-fcxx-exceptions -DUSE_CAPABILITY=0 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 -Wthread-safety 
-Wthread-safety-pointer -Wthread-safety-beta -Wno-thread-safety-negative 
-fcxx-exceptions -DUSE_CAPABILITY=1 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++17 -Wthread-safety 
-Wthread-safety-pointer -Wthread-safety-beta -Wno-thread-safety-negative 
-fcxx-exceptions -DUSE_CAPABILITY=0 %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++17 -Wthread-safety 
-Wthread-safety-pointer -Wthread-safety-beta -Wno-thread-safety-negative 
-fcxx-exceptions -DUSE_CAPABILITY=1 %s
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+struct foo {
+  ~foo();
+};
+struct bar : foo {};
+struct baz : bar {};
+baz foobar(baz a) { return a; }

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169593
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to