================ @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +// Test 1: Without C11 and without flag - should NOT warn +// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 %s -verify=c99-noflag -std=gnu99 \ ---------------- steakhal wrote:
So we use `gnu99`; couldn't we use the standard `c99` language flavour instead? I think the gnu variant allows the gnu extensions, which leads to a strictly broader l language flavour than standard C. Is this intentional? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168704 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
