================
@@ -1841,6 +1841,23 @@ def SVPMULLT_PAIR_U64   : SInst<"svpmullt_pair[_{d}]",   
"ddd", "Ul", MergeNone,
 def SVPMULLT_PAIR_N_U64 : SInst<"svpmullt_pair[_n_{d}]", "dda", "Ul", 
MergeNone, "aarch64_sve_pmullt_pair", [VerifyRuntimeMode]>;
 }
 
+let SVETargetGuard = "sve-aes2", SMETargetGuard = "sve-aes2,ssve-aes" in {
+def SVAESD_X2   : SInst<"svaesd_lane[_{d}_x2]",   "22di", "Uc", MergeNone, 
"aarch64_sve_aesd_lane_x2", [IsOverloadNone, VerifyRuntimeMode]>;
+def SVAESDIMC_X2 : SInst<"svaesdimc_lane[_{d}_x2]", "22di",  "Uc", MergeNone, 
"aarch64_sve_aesdimc_lane_x2", [IsOverloadNone, VerifyRuntimeMode]>;
+def SVAESE_X2   : SInst<"svaese_lane[_{d}_x2]",   "22di", "Uc", MergeNone, 
"aarch64_sve_aese_lane_x2", [IsOverloadNone, VerifyRuntimeMode]>;
+def SVAESEMC_X2  : SInst<"svaesemc_lane[_{d}_x2]",  "22di",  "Uc", MergeNone, 
"aarch64_sve_aesemc_lane_x2", [IsOverloadNone, VerifyRuntimeMode]>;
+
+def SVAESD_X4   : SInst<"svaesd_lane[_{d}_x4]",   "44di", "Uc", MergeNone, 
"aarch64_sve_aesd_lane_x4", [IsOverloadNone, VerifyRuntimeMode]>;
+def SVAESDIMC_X4 : SInst<"svaesdimc_lane[_{d}_x4]", "44di",  "Uc", MergeNone, 
"aarch64_sve_aesdimc_lane_x4", [IsOverloadNone, VerifyRuntimeMode]>;
+def SVAESE_X4   : SInst<"svaese_lane[_{d}_x4]",   "44di", "Uc", MergeNone, 
"aarch64_sve_aese_lane_x4", [IsOverloadNone, VerifyRuntimeMode]>;
+def SVAESEMC_X4  : SInst<"svaesemc_lane[_{d}_x4]",  "44di",  "Uc", MergeNone, 
"aarch64_sve_aesemc_lane_x4", [IsOverloadNone, VerifyRuntimeMode]>;
+
+def SVPMULL_PAIR_U64   : SInst<"svpmull_pair[_{d}_x2]",   "2dd", "Ul", 
MergeNone, "aarch64_sve_pmull_pair_x2", [IsOverloadNone, VerifyRuntimeMode]>;
+def SVPMULL_PAIR_N_U64 : SInst<"svpmull_pair[_n_{d}_x2]", "2da", "Ul", 
MergeNone, "aarch64_sve_pmull_pair_x2", [IsOverloadNone, VerifyRuntimeMode]>;
+def SVPMLAL_PAIR_U64   : SInst<"svpmlal_pair[_{d}_x2]",   "22dd", "Ul", 
MergeNone, "aarch64_sve_pmlal_pair_x2", [IsOverloadNone, VerifyRuntimeMode]>;
+def SVPMLAL_PAIR_N_U64 : SInst<"svpmlal_pair[_n_{d}_x2]", "22da", "Ul", 
MergeNone, "aarch64_sve_pmlal_pair_x2", [IsOverloadNone, VerifyRuntimeMode]>;
----------------
kmclaughlin-arm wrote:

The ACLE change describes variants of `pmull` & `pmlal` for `_s64x2` and 
`_f64x2`, should these be included here?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165545
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to