================
@@ -204,6 +204,13 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitStmt(const Stmt *S,
ArrayRef<const Attr *> Attrs) {
case Stmt::CXXForRangeStmtClass:
EmitCXXForRangeStmt(cast<CXXForRangeStmt>(*S), Attrs);
break;
+ case Stmt::CXXEnumeratingExpansionStmtPatternClass:
+ case Stmt::CXXIteratingExpansionStmtPatternClass:
+ case Stmt::CXXDestructuringExpansionStmtPatternClass:
+ case Stmt::CXXDependentExpansionStmtPatternClass:
+ llvm_unreachable("unexpanded expansion statements should not be emitted");
+ case Stmt::CXXExpansionStmtInstantiationClass:
+ llvm_unreachable("Todo");
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
I think we have an error mechanism for this? Also, it should be `TODO`,
capital makes these sorts of things greppable.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169680
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits