On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Daniel Dunbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > darwin x86-32 is '_', but it might be worth just consulting the gcc source.
I didn't bother trying previously, but since you asked... it's just as difficult as I figured it would be. I can't sort out how the heck the target definitions work, and I don't particularly feel like investing a ton of time into it. It's a lot easier to just check.the compiled gcc. > Would it make more sense to have this embedded in TargetIt probably doesn't > make much of a difference; it's easy to change if we ever need it.Info? It > looks > like it is something that is always set by GCC but the definition varies > based on the target. It probably doesn't make much of a difference; it's easy to change if we ever need it. > We may also need this information anyway in other > places, for example if we were to support -fno-underscores, but I haven't > investigated this. If we wanted to support -fno-underscores, we'd have to extend LLVM somehow... it would have to decorate the symbols differently. -Eli _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
