Neil Booth wrote: > Argiris Kirtzidis wrote:- > >> 3.3.2p4 says that #2 is local to the if statement, and 6.4p3 says that #2 >> goes out of scope when the if statement finishes. >> Are you suggesting that we handle these requirements for #2 without entering >> a new scope ? >> > > As I initially read the standard, yes, but I think you've persuaded > me the standard does require a new scope. >
Added comments about 3.3.2p4 here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080908/007543.html Hopefully it's a bit less confusing now :-) -Argiris _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
