Sebastian Redl wrote:
>
> Got one.
>
> struct O {
> struct I;
> };
>
> struct O::I {
> };
>
> Crashes with:
> clang: SemaDecl.cpp:81: void
> clang::Sema::PushDeclContext(clang::DeclContext*): Assertion
> `getContainingDC(DC) == CurContext && "The next DeclContext should be
> directly contained in the current one."' failed.
Great find! Note that it also happens if you change "struct O {" to
"namespace O {".
>
> I think the assertion is simply bogus, though.
It should say "The next DeclContext should be lexically contained in the
current one.", which is what the assertion is about.
I think a ScopedDecl should be able to give it's lexical declaration
context, that is:
namespace A {
void f(); // Lexically and semantically in A
}
void A::f(){} // Semantically in A but lexically in global namespace.
Thanks a lot for your help!
-Argiris
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
