Douglas Gregor wrote: > Author: dgregor > Date: Tue Jan 13 17:10:51 2009 > New Revision: 62192 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=62192&view=rev > Log: > Permitting typedefs without a name is a Microsoft/GNU extension > You've really got to wonder what motivated such an extension in the first place. Let's say the code was accepted due to a compiler bug. It is still completely useless! How can there be enough of such code to force a compatibility extension?
Sebastian _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
