Douglas Gregor wrote: > > On Jan 14, 2009, at 8:36 AM, Sebastian Redl wrote: > >> Douglas Gregor wrote: >>> Author: dgregor >>> Date: Wed Jan 14 09:45:31 2009 >>> New Revision: 62231 >>> >>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=62231&view=rev >>> Log: >>> Introduce support for C++0x explicit conversion operators (N2437) >>> >> >> Heh. Not that I'm complaining, but isn't it a bit early for C++0x >> features? > > > Generally, yes. But can't a compiler writer have a little fun now and > again? :)
As I said, I'm not complaining. This brings Clang one step closer to compiling the library I'm writing, for which no compiler exists. It uses concepts, explicit conversion operators, deleted members, rvalue references, and I'm not yet done. :-) (Speaking of which, could you visit comp.std.c++ and answer my query about constrained members?) Sebastian _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
