On Jan 16, 2009, at 12:50 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
>>> My complaint about putting a default: in there still stands: it
>>> suppresses a useful warning, where we've omitted a case, and turns
>>> it into a run-time failure.
>>
>> Does GCC produce a warning for cases like:
>>
>> int foo() {
>> switch (someenum) {
>> case <all possible enums>:
>> return 0;
>> }
>> // no return
>> }
>>
>> About falling off the end of the function?
>
> Yeah, it does.
That's bad. Can we just use default: assert(0) in those cases?
-Chris
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
