On Jan 21, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Nice! One request: can the name be something other than "modern" ABI. > Whats modern today isn't tomorrow. > I referred to is is 'modern' because this is how the run-time group refer to it. But I am definitely open to suggestions.
> My understanding is that this was being referred to as the > "Objective-C 2 ABI" (different from Objective-C 2.0). Or would it be Initially this was the case because we also had Objective-C 3 ABI as a hybrid version of the two ABIs. We canned the hybrid abi so we (I) was stuck with Objective-C 2. > > reasonable to call it the Objective-C 64-bit API? No, for the reason that I am not at liberty to explain. - Fariborz > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
