On Feb 11, 2009, at 10:30 AM, steve naroff wrote: >> Shouldn't this reject aggregates with an error? >> > > I'd prefer we make this an error for all cases (rather than a mix of > errors/warnings). > > GCC's "implicit" diagnostics (based on the underlying function call/ > ABI) seem like a poor model for clang to follow (in retrospect).
This has to be an error for aggregates and "should" be an error for integers. I'm fine keeping it a warning for integers or just emitting an error for either, your choice! > Here is a small test case below (with clang/gcc output). nice! -Chris _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
