On Feb 14, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Feb 14, 2009, at 9:59 AM, Fariborz Jahanian wrote: > >> I am sure you want the simplification to be equivalent to the >> original (even though it >> is not obvious to me right away :). > > I'm not sure what you're saying here. Are you saying that I broke > something? Sorry I wasn't clear. As long as a protocol which is both unavailable and deprecated (well just for the sake of argument). triggers two warning then behaviour is the same. protocol-atttribute-1.m tests that. So we are OK.
- Fariborz > > -Chris > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
