We are still using RangeConstraintManager by default, because UseRanges has
default value 'true'. It shows that RangeConstraintManager has already
passed all regression tests.

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Ben Laurie <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Ted Kremenek <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Author: kremenek
> > Date: Sun Feb 15 22:54:20 2009
> > New Revision: 64627
> >
> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=64627&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Do not register 'RangeConstraintManager' as the default
> ConstraintManager.
>
> I should note that this didn't work, by the way.
>
> >
> > Modified:
> >    cfe/trunk/lib/Analysis/RangeConstraintManager.cpp
> >
> > Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Analysis/RangeConstraintManager.cpp
> > URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Analysis/RangeConstraintManager.cpp?rev=64627&r1=64626&r2=64627&view=diff
> >
> >
> ==============================================================================
> > --- cfe/trunk/lib/Analysis/RangeConstraintManager.cpp (original)
> > +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Analysis/RangeConstraintManager.cpp Sun Feb 15 22:54:20
> 2009
> > @@ -461,8 +461,6 @@
> >   return new RangeConstraintManager(StateMgr);
> >  }
> >
> > -RegisterConstraintManager X(CreateRangeConstraintManager);
> > -
> >  const GRState*
> >  RangeConstraintManager::AssumeSymNE(const GRState* St, SymbolRef sym,
> >                                     const llvm::APSInt& V, bool&
> isFeasible) {
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cfe-commits mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to