On Mar 1, 2009, at 2:21 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > On Mar 1, 2009, at 1:05 PM, Anders Carlsson wrote: >> is going to blow up because the returned block references a stack >> variable that doesn't exist. > > Yes, known issue. We don't support Block_copy in it's full > generality yet. I'll probably be doing that next week. The > aforementioned projects don't use Block_copy in this way.
If __block variables don't work with Block_copy, then I can't see how they are not an unsupported feature (Especially not since you're going to get miscompiles and potentially crashes in generated code). Anders _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
