On Mar 21, 2009, at 2:21 AM, Cédric Venet wrote: > Chris Lattner a écrit : >> Author: lattner >> Date: Sat Mar 21 01:19:20 2009 >> New Revision: 67429 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=67429&view=rev >> Log: >> simplify CXXNameMangler::mangle, making it exit earlier for C >> functions. >> This speeds up a testcase in 3810 by ~16%. >> >> > > On windows, function name are 'mangled' by prefixing the name with > an underscore or arobase and depending to the calling convention > suffixed with the size of the arguments. Should this be done here?
No, this should be done by the llvm code generator. > ps: should the list have a reply-to:[email protected]? Like it > is actually, it is easy to reply only to the sender. I don't have a strong opinion on this either way. -Chris _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
