>>! In D4393#10, @joerg wrote: > Please keep in mind that GCC will effectively pass *all* unknown flags down > to ld, which is why this sort of issue appeared in first place. That's also > why I am quite strongly opposed against adding more non-driver flags in the > front end. OK. I understand your argument. Make sense! What about updating the error message to say something like "Passing linker flags without -Wl, is unsupported" ? It could simplify the work of porting.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4393 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
