On Jul 7, 2014, at 10:37 , Manuel Klimek <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Jul 7, 2014, at 10:28 , Manuel Klimek <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Can you add an assertion at the end of a block that there are no outstanding 
>> temporary destructors in the current stack frame? That seems useful.
>> 
>> Do you mean at the end of a VisitBlockDecl?
> 
> No, during the path-sensitive run, so handleBlockExit.
> 
> So you mean at the end of a CFG block? But here we might have outstanding 
> temporary dtors open (?) 

Oops, right. Was thinking too much in terms of AST structure. How about at the 
end of a function (inlined or not)?
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to