On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Dan Albert <[email protected]> wrote:
> jroelofs: I know you had mentioned that the unwinder might be moving to
> compiler-rt. Any idea about timeline on that?
>
There isn't one. Some people say they like this to happen every now and
then, but nobody's working on it. (And the arm unwinder needs to depend on
libc++abi if type matching is going to be implemented, as far as I
understand.)
>
> ================
> Comment at: src/Unwind/CMakeLists.txt:88
> @@ +87,3 @@
> + LINK_FLAGS "${link_flags}"
> + OUTPUT_NAME "llvmunwind"
> + VERSION "1.0"
> ----------------
> Do we want it to just be libunwind? Could also build it in to libc++abi
> (or compiler-rt), but I assume we want it to be a different library.
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D4448
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
