On 11/07/14 4:12 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Eric Christopher <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Brad Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
On 11/07/14 3:29 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
Seems reasonable. Do you really mean to default to soft-float?
Well that can be changed as another commit. Speaking to another
developer regarding SPARC floating point support it seems the
default with GCC is hard, but I am not sure if that is OS
config specific and need to do a bit more digging to see
what should be done.
That's why I asked, I seem to recall the default being hard float for
sparc in the past.
BTW, it's not an objection to the patch, that's fine, just curious about intent.
Oh I didn't take it that way. I looked at the GCC man page as I was
looking into this bit of code within LLVM to try and ensure it was
following a similar enough behavior as GCC is. Small steps in the
right / appropriate direction.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
