On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <[email protected] > wrote:
> Hi all, > the attached patch ensures that __INTPTR_TYPE__ and __UINTPTR_TYPE__ are > consistent as the existing logic would pick e.g. long and unsigned int > on ARM. One issue I found during this is that the NVPTX backend is > using unsigned types here, which doesn't make sense to me. > The change to SemaOverload.cpp looks unrelated? Other than that, this LGTM, although I'm a little concerned that it might be intptr_t we were getting wrong on some of those targets rather than uintptr_t. Have you checked that this gives the same results as GCC?
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
