On 10/07/2014 15:45, Aaron Ballman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Tyler Nowicki <[email protected]> wrote:
If these pragmas are silently ignored when then they don’t have much value.
A big part of their value come from the confirmation that they are working.
The warning will only be generated on loops with #pragma clang loop
vectorize/interleave/unroll specified. It can also be silenced using the
command line option -Wno-optimization-warning.
I’m still looking into the clang in 32-bit mode question posed earlier. Are
there any other comments on the patches?
Clang side LGTM!
We don't accept user-facing frontend patches like this without tests.
The implementation has a couple of issues too and will need another
round of review to fit into the the backend/frontend diagnostic setup.
See
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140714/110198.html
for details.
I pinged Tyler a couple of days ago and haven't heard back, so reverted
this commit in r213260 until the issues can be addressed.
Thanks
Alp.
~Aaron
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
--
http://www.nuanti.com
the browser experts
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
