On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:47:14PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > at the moment, users of __INT8_TYPE__ are expected to prefix it with an > explicit signed. We recently got support for __UINTx_TYPE__, so the > primary reason for that odity disappeared. I'd like to make our macros > compatible with the simpler GCC definition, so that __INT8_TYPE__ is > signed char and the others can be defined without signed. This > potentially breaks out of tree users of __INTx_TYPE__, so I would like > to get a consensus here first.
Ping? Joerg _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
