> While we're discussing the format of the test results, I vote for posting the output of lit -sv test (make check-libcxx), since it will actually show what error happened. Much more helpful than "Needs investigation".
Seconded. Plus it's a lot easier to maintain. Ismail, As Dan asked could you please provide some more information about your setup. Along with your glibc version could you please provide information about the distribution your using as well as the compiler? Best, Eric On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Dan Albert <[email protected]> wrote: > İsmail, that's new to me as well. What version of glibc are you using? > > While we're discussing the format of the test results, I vote for posting > the output of lit -sv test (make check-libcxx), since it will actually show > what error happened. Much more helpful than "Needs investigation". > > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 5:21 AM, İsmail Dönmez <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Eric Fiselier <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Author: ericwf >>> Date: Thu Jul 31 20:59:09 2014 >>> New Revision: 214474 >>> >>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=214474&view=rev >>> Log: >>> Update linux test results file >>> >>> Modified: >>> libcxx/trunk/www/results.Linux.html >>> >> >> Compared to your results, I also get: >> >> stdbool_h.pass.cpp:19:2: error: bool should not be defined >> #error bool should not be defined >> >> ^ >> I guess you are not seeing this? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >> >> >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
