As much as I would like to take testit out back and shoot it, previous conversations with @mclow.lists leads me to believe its still widely used. Since lit usually isn't available outside of the LLVM repo I'm not sure that removing testit is viable at this point.
I would like to see LIT become a standalone "first-class" binary so it could be easier to use outside of makefile rules. Daniel Dunbar expressed some thoughts to this end a while ago. I will follow those up with him. My current workflow is something like: ``` alias lit="python /path/to/llvm/utils/lit/lit.py" cp libcxx-build/lit.site.cfg libcxx/test/lit.site.cfg ``` Until its as easy to use LIT in the source tree as it is the testit script I don't think we can even consider removing it. http://reviews.llvm.org/D4759 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
