Author: majnemer
Date: Tue Aug 5 22:12:47 2014
New Revision: 214947
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=214947&view=rev
Log:
MS ABI: Mangle lambdas which are given the same mangling number
It is possible for lambdas to get the same mangling number because they
may exist in different mangling contexts. To handle this correctly,
mangle the context into the name as well.
Modified:
cfe/trunk/lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp
cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-cxx11.cpp
Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp
URL:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp?rev=214947&r1=214946&r2=214947&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/AST/MicrosoftMangle.cpp Tue Aug 5 22:12:47 2014
@@ -802,10 +802,7 @@ void MicrosoftCXXNameMangler::mangleUnqu
void MicrosoftCXXNameMangler::mangleNestedName(const NamedDecl *ND) {
// <postfix> ::= <unqualified-name> [<postfix>]
// ::= <substitution> [<postfix>]
- if (isLambda(ND))
- return;
-
- const DeclContext *DC = ND->getDeclContext();
+ const DeclContext *DC = getEffectiveDeclContext(ND);
while (!DC->isTranslationUnit()) {
if (isa<TagDecl>(ND) || isa<VarDecl>(ND)) {
Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-cxx11.cpp
URL:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-cxx11.cpp?rev=214947&r1=214946&r2=214947&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-cxx11.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-cxx11.cpp Tue Aug 5 22:12:47 2014
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ namespace PR18022 {
struct { } a;
decltype(a) fun(decltype(a) x, decltype(a)) { return x; }
-// CHECK-DAG: ?fun@PR18022@@YA?AU<unnamed-type-a>@1@U21@0@Z
+// CHECK-DAG: @"\01?fun@PR18022@@YA?AU<unnamed-type-a>@1@U21@0@Z"
}
@@ -106,17 +106,32 @@ inline int define_lambda() {
static auto lambda = [] { static int local; ++local; return local; };
// First, we have the static local variable of type "<lambda_1>" inside of
// "define_lambda".
-// CHECK-DAG: ?lambda@?1??define_lambda@@YAHXZ@4V<lambda_1>@@A
+// CHECK-DAG: @"\01?lambda@?1??define_lambda@@YAHXZ@4V<lambda_1>@?1@YAHXZ@A"
// Next, we have the "operator()" for "<lambda_1>" which is inside of
// "define_lambda".
-// CHECK-DAG: ??R<lambda_1>@?define_lambda@@YAHXZ@QBEHXZ
+// CHECK-DAG: @"\01??R<lambda_1>@?define_lambda@@YAHXZ@QBEHXZ"
// Finally, we have the local which is inside of "<lambda_1>" which is inside
of
// "define_lambda". Hooray.
-// CHECK-DAG: ?local@?2???R<lambda_1>@?define_lambda@@YAHXZ@QBEHXZ@4HA
+// CHECK-DAG: @"\01?local@?2???R<lambda_1>@?define_lambda@@YAHXZ@QBEHXZ@4HA"
return lambda();
}
+template <typename T>
+void use_lambda_arg(T) {}
+
+inline void call_with_lambda_arg1() {
+ use_lambda_arg([]{});
+ // CHECK-DAG:
@"\01??$use_lambda_arg@V<lambda_1>@?call_with_lambda_arg1@@YAXXZ@@@YAXV<lambda_1>@?call_with_lambda_arg1@@YAXXZ@@Z"
+}
+
+inline void call_with_lambda_arg2() {
+ use_lambda_arg([]{});
+ // CHECK-DAG:
@"\01??$use_lambda_arg@V<lambda_1>@?call_with_lambda_arg2@@YAXXZ@@@YAXV<lambda_1>@?call_with_lambda_arg2@@YAXXZ@@Z"
+}
+
int call_lambda() {
+ call_with_lambda_arg1();
+ call_with_lambda_arg2();
return define_lambda();
}
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits