Pinging this now that 3.5 is branched. On 07/21/2014 04:35 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Paul Fox <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:Rebasing against trunk does not appear to have caused any changes to the patch, but here is the change in a single patch. Thanks!Thanks Paul. Please ping this again after the branch is cut and I will commit.Eli On 07/21/2014 04:18 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Paul Fox <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: What is the procedure for getting this merged? Is any further action required on my part? I haven't been able to find specifics on this process beyond posting patches to this list for review. Paul, rebase your patches vs. latest trunk and then I can commit it for you. Eli On 06/27/2014 12:02 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:LGTM On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Paul Fox <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Here are initial patches that expose the inheritable attributes for OpenCL in libclang, including the python bindings. I initially posted these on the dev mailing list, but since they received no response, I presume that this list is a better place for them. As far as I can tell, since the address space attributes are type attributes, exposing them will require adding to the libclang API. Along these lines, it might be useful to have a generalized way to query type attributes so that more semantic analysis can be done through libclang. Any thoughts on this? Paul Fox _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
