I can see why you need some of codegen exposed, but do you really need all of it? Maybe we should have a lib/ABI that is used by lib/CodeGen?
On 23 August 2014 17:06, DeadMG <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > I have attached a quick patch, which simply moves some previously-internal > CodeGen headers into the public include, based on r216273. > > Placing these headers in the public include will drastically simplify the > development cycle for the layer on top of CodeGen that I discussed on > cfe-dev, targetted for 3.6. Developing that layer on top of 3.4 was a pain > for me as requiring all my users and developers to build LLVM and Clang from > source was time-consuming and fiddly. > > Ideally, this would be merged into 3.5 (although I believe that ship has > sailed even for such simple patches) or a hypothetical 3.5.1. As this only > moves a few headers from one location to another, extensive testing > shouldn't be required, but just for the record, I tested on Ubuntu 14.04 > with no additional failures. > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
