================
Comment at:
test/depr/exception.unexpected/set.unexpected/get_unexpected.pass.cpp:32
@@ -28,3 +31,3 @@
// verify there is a previous unexpected handler
assert(old);
std::set_unexpected(f1);
----------------
This assertion does not hold for MSVCRT, as a null handler represents the
default behavior. Would it be better to make this check conditionally instead
of marking the whole test as failed?
================
Comment at:
test/depr/exception.unexpected/set.unexpected/get_unexpected.pass.cpp:40
@@ -36,3 +39,3 @@
std::set_terminate(f3);
(*old)();
assert(0);
----------------
This does not hold for MSVCRT either. Assuming the previous assertion is
skipped for it, this could be tested by setting the unexpected handler to its
original value and calling `unexpected()`.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D5131
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
