On 2 September 2014 11:34, Samuel Benzaquen <[email protected]> wrote: > I did try splitting it up. It doesn't scale much. > Each part contains duplicate template instantiations, so splitting in N > pieces will not make each one 1/Nth of the total. > Tried 1-5 pieces. These are the results: > # parts | # symbols | total # > | per part | symbols > 1 | ~19k | ~19k > 2 | ~13k | ~26k > 3 | ~10k | ~30k > 4 | ~9k | ~36k > 5 | ~8k | ~40k > > Note that I did not try to group similar matchers together (which would be a > maintenance nightmare), so each part ends up instantiating most of the common > templates for a lot (most?) of the node types.
What is the compile time impact? In particular, how slow is the slowest one after the split compared with the original? Cheers, Rafael _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
