On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Is supporting the __attribute__ (( naked )) spelling on x86 intentional?

I don't know if there was any specific motivation. I suspect whoever
added it didn't see any reason to make it target dependent. Maybe gcc
implements it at a lower level, so that it has to be enabled
explicitly per target.

 - Hans
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to