So you mean we can delete CC_PnaclCall and attr_pnaclcall from clang?
On 12 September 2014 13:25, JF Bastien <[email protected]> wrote: > - No need to use PNaCl's calling convention since PNaCl now uses a separate > approach for calling conventions. > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D5318 > > Files: > include/clang/Basic/BuiltinsLe64.def > include/clang/Basic/TargetBuiltins.h > include/clang/module.modulemap > lib/Basic/Targets.cpp > test/Driver/le64-unknown-unknown.cpp > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
