+#include <adxintrin.h> + #ifdef __ADX__ ?
And any reason the two sets of builtins aren't in the same patch or were you planning on one large commit for this? -eric On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Reid Kleckner <[email protected]> wrote: > Clang patches LGTM with some tweaks. > > +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -target-feature +adx > -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s > + > +// Don't include mm_malloc.h, it's system specific. > +#define __MM_MALLOC_H > > You can use the -ffreestanding flag to avoid this quirk, I believe. > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Robert Khasanov <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Ping >> Could anyone review clang patches? >> >> 2014-08-25 15:58 GMT+04:00 Robert Khasanov <[email protected]>: >> >>> Ping >>> >>> >>> >>> 2014-08-21 13:53 GMT+04:00 Robert Khasanov <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Thanks for review, Nadav! >>>> >>>> Committed rev216161, 216162, 216163, 216164. >>>> >>>> Could anyone review clang patches? >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-08-20 20:41 GMT+04:00 Nadav Rotem <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> The LLVM patches LGTM. Thanks Robert! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > On Aug 20, 2014, at 8:55 AM, Robert Khasanov <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi All, >>>>> > >>>>> > These patches enable Broadwell subtarget: >>>>> > Broadwell ISA includes Haswell ISA + ADX + RDSEED + SMAP >>>>> > New instructions were already enabled. These patches define >>>>> broadwell cpu, SMAP Feature and add intrinsics to LLVM/clang >>>>> > >>>>> <001_llvm_broadwell_target.patch><002_llvm_adox_adcx.patch><003_llvm_smap.patch><004_llvm_adc_sbb.patch><005_clang_broadwell_target.patch><006_clang_adx.patch><007_clang_adc_sbb.patch> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
