> def err_no_submodule : Error<"no submodule named %0 in module '%1'">;
> Index: lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp
> ===================================================================
> --- lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp (revision 217432)
> +++ lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp (working copy)
> @@ -339,6 +339,15 @@
> if (!getHeaderSearchOpts().DisableModuleHash)
> llvm::sys::path::append(SpecificModuleCache,
> getInvocation().getModuleHash());
> +
> + // If the path is not writable we can't do anything but diagnose.
> + if (llvm::sys::fs::exists(SpecificModuleCache.str()) &&
> + !llvm::sys::fs::can_write(SpecificModuleCache.str())) {
I think this check should only happen if we are building a module, or is there
some reason we don’t want to allow read-only module caches when all the modules
are prebuilt?
Ben
> On Sep 17, 2014, at 1:04 AM, Vassil Vassilev <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am attaching a patch addressing llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20467
> Vassil
>
> <Bug20467.diff>_______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
